Manchester City Appeals, Calling the Verdict Against It 'Unsafe'
The club has confirmed an appeal against its Premier League guilty verdict, saying the ruling contains clear material errors of law, principle and fact. The Treasury Committee has asked HMRC to look at the tax implications.
Fact.et Staff
Editorial · October 2, 2026

Manchester City have confirmed they will appeal the guilty verdict returned against them over Premier League rule breaches, saying in a statement that the ruling contains "clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe".
Three fronts, not one
The appeal is the club's own front. Two others opened around it within a day.
The Treasury Committee, which oversees HMRC, has urged the tax authority to scrutinise the tax implications of the verdict — a finding about how payments were recorded in football is also, potentially, a finding about how they were treated for tax.
And the politics moved. After the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, drew a backlash for his remarks on the case, Downing Street said the club was not "above the rules". The prime minister also said he would be "really concerned" if City's owners were to sell up.
The squad question
BBC Sport reports that the verdict bears on the futures of existing players and on the club's transfer dealings. That is the commercial core of it: a sanction that touches squad registration or spending capacity is priced into every contract negotiation the club opens from here, and the appeal does not pause that uncertainty, it extends it.
Open
No sanction detail has been published alongside the verdict in this reporting, and no timetable has been given for the appeal to be heard. HMRC has not said whether it will act on the Treasury Committee's request. Until the appeal concludes, neither the penalty nor the club's spending position is settled.
Sources: BBC Sport, 2 October 2026, BBC Sport, 2 October 2026, BBC Sport, 1 October 2026, BBC News, 1 October 2026
About Fact.et Staff
Reporting on Ethiopian business, entrepreneurship and innovation.



Comments
No comments yet — be the first.